4148
As regards the prehistory of the Oedipus complex in boys we are far from
complete clarity. We know that that period includes an identification of an
affectionate sort with the boy’s father, an identification which is still free from
any sense of rivalry in regard to his mother. Another element of that stage is
invariably, I believe, a masturbatory activity in connection with the genitals,
the masturbation of early childhood, the more or less violent suppression of
which by those in charge of the child sets the castration complex in action. It
is to be assumed that this masturbation is attached to the Oedipus complex and
serves as a discharge for the sexual excitation belonging to it. It is,
however, uncertain whether the masturbation has this character from the first, or
whether on the contrary it makes its first appearance spontaneously as an activity
of a bodily organ and is only brought into relation with the Oedipus complex at
some later date; this second possibility is by far the more probable. Another
doubtful question is the part played by bed-wetting and by the breaking of that
habit through the intervention of training measures. We are inclined to make
the simple connection that continued bed-wetting is a result of masturbation and
that its suppression is regarded by boys as an inhibition of their genital
activity - that is, as having the meaning of a threat of castration; but whether
we are always right in supposing this remains to be seen. Finally, analysis
shows us in a shadowy way how the fact of a child at a very early age listening to
his parents copulating may set up his first sexual excitation, and how that
event may, owing to its after-effects, act as a starting-point for the child’s
whole sexual development. Masturbation, as well as the two attitudes in the
Oedipus complex, later on become attached to this early experience, the child having
subsequently interpreted its meaning. It is impossible, however, to suppose
that these observations of coitus are of universal occurrence, so that at this
point we are faced with the problem of ‘primal phantasies’. Thus the prehistory of
the Oedipus complex, even in boys, raises all of these questions for sifting
and explanation; and there is the further problem of whether we are to suppose
that the process invariably follows the same course, or whether a great variety
of different preliminary stages may not converge upon the same terminal
situation.