3696
Apparent death and the re-animation of the dead have been represented as
most uncanny themes. But things of this sort too are very common in fairy
stories. Who would be so bold as to call it uncanny, for instance, when Snow-White
opens her eyes once more? And the resuscitation of the dead in accounts of
miracles, as in the New Testament, elicits feelings quite unrelated to the uncanny.
Then, too, the theme that achieves such an indubitably uncanny effect, the
unintended recurrence of the same thing, serves other and quite different purposes in
another class of cases. We have already come across one example in which it is
employed to call up a feeling of the comic; and we could multiply instances of
this kind. Or again, it works as a means of emphasis, and so on. And once
more: what is the origin of the uncanny effect of silence, darkness and solitude?
Do not these factors point to the part played by danger in the genesis of what
is uncanny, notwithstanding that in children these same factors are the most
frequent determinants of the expression of fear? And are we after all justified in
entirely ignoring intellectual uncertainty as a factor, seeing that we have
admitted its importance in relation to death?
It is evident therefore, that we must be prepared to admit that there are
other elements besides those which we have so far laid down as determining the
production of uncanny feelings. We might say that these preliminary results have
satisfied psycho-analytic interest in the problem of the uncanny, and that what remains probably calls
for an aesthetic enquiry. But that would be to open the door to doubts about what exactly is
the value of our general contention that the uncanny proceeds from something
familiar which has been repressed.
We have noticed one point which may help us to resolve these uncertainties:
nearly all the instances that contradict our hypothesis are taken from the
realm of fiction, of imaginative writing. This suggests that we should
differentiate between the uncanny that we actually experience and the uncanny that we
merely picture or read about.
What is experienced as uncanny is much more simply conditioned but comprises far fewer instances.
We shall find, I think, that it fits in perfectly with our attempt at a
solution, and can be traced back without exception to something familiar that has
been repressed. But here, too, we must make a certain important and
psychologically significant differentiation in our material, which is best illustrated by
turning to suitable examples.