2997
Proceeding now to an account of the positive findings of psycho-analysis, we
may say that in general a psychical act goes through two phases as regards its
state, between which is interposed a kind of testing (censorship). In the
first phase the psychical act is unconscious and belongs to the system Ucs.; if, on testing, it is rejected by the censorship, it is not allowed to pass
into the second phase; it is then said to be ‘repressed’ and must remain
unconscious. If, however, it passes this testing, it enters the second phase and
thenceforth belongs to the second system, which we will call the system Cs. But the fact that it belongs to that system does not yet unequivocally
determine its relation to consciousness. It is not yet conscious, but it is
certainly capable of becoming conscious (to use Breuer’s expression) - that is, it can now, given certain conditions,
become an object of consciousness without any special resistance. In
consideration of this capacity for becoming conscious we also call the system Cs. the ‘preconscious’. If it should turn out that a certain censorship also
plays a part in determining whether the preconscious becomes conscious, we shall
discriminate more sharply between the systems Pcs. and Cs. For the present let it suffice us to bear in mind that the system Pcs. shares the characteristics of the system Cs. and that the rigorous censorship exercises its office at the point of
transition from the Ucs. to the Pcs. (or Cs.).
By accepting the existence of these two (or three) psychical systems,
psycho-analysis has departed a step further from the descriptive ‘psychology of
consciousness’ and has raised new problems and acquired a new content. Up till now,
it has differed from that psychology mainly by reason of its dynamic view of mental processes; now in addition it seems to take account of
psychical topography as well, and to indicate in respect of any given mental act within what
system or between what systems it takes place. On account of this attempt, too, it
has been given the name of ‘depth-psychology’. We shall hear that it can be
further enriched by taking yet another point of view into account.